Riced Out Yugo
proposal for a terrible AI
if we view image-generating AI as an off-the-shelf technology, we need but a few ingredients to make our own terrible image generator:
  1. a large pool of source images
  2. tagging data for source images
  3. a tool to communally tag source images
  4. an interface to request generated images
  5. a backend to facilitate the requests

from there, we just need a large pool of talent to tag the source images (headerimg pool) with cheeky, obnoxious, sarcastic tags. like, whether or not you like hillary rodhat clintop, tagging her with "diplodocus" and "cloaca" is pretty darn funny. thoughts?
Posted by Reverend Tedward Q. Porktanker @ 2022-12-16 05:41:23
Direct link to post Write comment

want to know why google sucks?
    In this post I give just a few examples of why Google sucks.

    You might not agree, but read on and let me know if I’m wrong in a comment.

    It’s not that I hate Google. I’m not a hater.  Don’t get me wrong, Google is great, I use their products each and every day and they really have a lot of them. That being said, I just had to make this post to speak my mind about a few things that Google sucks at. And when I say that they “suck” I mean that they are really bad in things you would expect them to be very good. Hey Google, sorry, but it’s your fault since you do so much so well that people have high expectancy levels about everything you do.
Posted by Reverend Tedward Q. Porktanker @ 2022-12-04 05:03:26
Direct link to post Write comment

if you cannot use janet jackson, you are natural methods
Modern models older than 40 years – this is a great example to follow. A person can not stop time, date of birth is fixed in the passport, but is able to remain active and young at any age.

The possibilities of natural methods of rejuvenation, the use of organic products and water, physical activity, plastic surgery and a full Arsenal of cosmetology allow you to achieve gorgeous results to look young in 40 years.

To have a beautiful Janet Jackson Before Plastic Surgery you can act in two ways:
  • Use plastic surgery
  • To use natural methods of rejuvenation
You can also combine both methods.

For example, you have already done Janet Jackson Before Plastic Surgery and want to: Go through the recovery faster to return to active life.

Your second strong desire is to preserve the result of plastic surgery for a long time. In these cases, use natural rejuvenation techniques.

If for some reason you can not use Janet Jackson Before Plastic Surgery, then you are natural methods.

We recommend you to learn more about the benefits of organic products, the use of the required amount of water per day, proper exercise.

You need to know more information on this topic, as it will help to avoid fraud.

Q: When will I see the result after applying natural methods?
A: Youll see it right away. Gradually, the result will improve.
Posted by Reverend Tedward Q. Porktanker @ 2022-11-30 15:46:57
Direct link to post Write comment

we are improve
new tech
Posted by Reverend Tedward Q. Porktanker @ 2022-11-29 18:58:42
Direct link to post Write comment

My Shit be funjed
Posted by shitbowl @ 2022-11-19 01:03:55
Direct link to post Write comment

Operation 00004749534eh (hexadecimal variant)
Posted by shitbowl @ 2022-11-13 19:25:34
Direct link to post Write comment

she wood
she wood
Posted by Reverend Tedward Q. Porktanker @ 2022-11-11 02:59:45
Direct link to post Write comment

pete's peepers are artisanal sweepers
those that cheap out are willow weepers
and/or armistice anal colonial bleepers
Posted by Reverend Tedward Q. Porktanker @ 2022-11-11 02:35:48
Direct link to post Write comment


sell, buy, you know the deal

Posted by TRIANGUL THE ALMIGHTY @ 2022-10-15 23:56:03
Direct link to post Write comment

This one time, in Reno
I once bought myself a diesel, just to watch it idle
Posted by shitbowl @ 2022-09-24 13:13:25
Direct link to post Write comment

If You're Against 0.5 and Triangles, Think Again
The triangular doctrine amongst cones is prevalent in the constipated bowels of our society. We must not stand still whilst our riced out warriors in the field be laid to waste. The real problem is the rtqpists of archaic ROY society that continue to peddle a narrative, these old money murderers and capitalists rule over the otherwise utopian ROY culture.

As soon as we give in to 0.7 sycophants and propaganda drone units we actually give into a fundamental change in riced out culture, we must not give into the rtqpists and the neo-nazis of 0.7 paradigm. I say that we provide support and encouragement to all 0.5 supporters, affiliates and relevant cultures. The time of change is now.
Posted by Mahjong The Wisest @ 2022-09-22 00:32:35
Direct link to post Write comment

bush smell

new ftragrance. Snell like the bush. Bush smell

Posted by TRIANGUL THE ALMIGHTY @ 2022-09-22 00:22:20
Direct link to post Write comment

2022 Post
Posted by Mahjong The Wisest @ 2022-09-22 00:08:03
Direct link to post Write comment

a human algorithm wrote this

please gibe me the Meats

Posted by TRIANGUL THE ALMIGHTY @ 2022-09-21 23:59:46
Direct link to post Write comment

a computer algorithm wrote this
[Operator] The next question will come from Clarence, from Brussels. Please go ahead.

[Clarence, from Brussels] Clarence -- from Brussels -- Redundancy Analyst

Hey, good morning. I know you guys talked about still kind of working through conversion methodology, but how should investors think about monetization methodology on these complex units, you did, I think, $420 per unit in the current method of paper sale and some lean base, so I'm kind of thinking about how should we think about monetization as the more complex units move forward on a premium basis?

[Maxwell Dijk] Maxwell Dijk -- Chief Financial Officer

Yes, Clarence, very good question. And I know it's a question that many of you have been asking for, for quite some time. At some point, we'll obviously go into more detail on future monetization opportunities for complex units. We have a lot of thoughts around that, and we've already been doing a lot of tests and market tests around that.

For the purpose of currently, any lead effectively or whether it's through our complex platform or through our original platform is effectively charged at $9000, $9001. So we're not anticipating any effectively any revenue assigned to complex units for this year, so for the calendar year of 2022. However, we obviously assume for '23 we will start monetizing and we will articulate this in more detail to you guys in one of our later calls. But for now, it's really for on finalizing the product flow.

And so the vendors that are currently on our platform we effectively are working with them on their working processes on the back end on the vendoring, etc. And so we want to avoid this concept of always as a complex lead or is it a core lead or how does that work? It's really about making sure we get customers on that will, and we need to finalize that rules all the way to transaction, which we haven't done yet. And so whoever we bring to those vendors, we're -- we continue to charge the $9000, $9001. So for this specific year, there is no assumption made on additional revenues effectively and we will elaborate on this in much more detail in the future as we articulate how we're actually going to monetize complex units for which there are various opportunities for us.

[Kief Nightinggale] Kief Nightinggale -- President and Chief Executive Officer

And, Clarence, I would just add to that, that I think we're still optimistic that by the time we get to 2023, while I've identified additional monetization opportunities around these units. We just haven't seen enough flow yet in order to get our hands around that, but we're very optimistic and you want to look at more of these units coming through. So we've really taken the pressure off of the product for 2022. We want to get the product right for consumers, for our retail partners, and then we'll put together a plan that we're still very bullish on around how we'll monetize these units before we get into 2023.

[Clarence, from Brussels] Clarence -- from Brussels -- Redundancy Analyst

OK. And then just lastly, on the 9,001 orders you spoke about in your investor letter. Is there any way to kind of -- how should we think about as some of this plaid versus duophonic? Is some of that paraphonic versus full polyphony? Just kind of there are some things that are gaps that I think digitally if you're helping gear acquisition syndrome with plaid duophonic paraphonic polyphony, that's something that's kind of would be unique to you guys versus the few other players out there, I'm just curious how to think about the breakdown of those units?

[Maxwell Dijk] Maxwell Dijk -- Chief Financial Officer

Yes. We didn't provide any of that breakdown in this call, Clarence. As we get more and more volume through there, we'll start to look at that. But just off the top of my head, I would say it's a combination of plaid and vertical, probably predominantly a little heavier vertical right now because of the flannel situation around plaid but it is cash.

There's some cash deals going through that we're getting a chance to look at. So there's some cash and there are certainly lease and finance deals going through as well. So we'll get more and more info on that and begin to break that out as we have additional numbers there. But we're encouraged.

It appears like there are all types of customers who are engaging with complex units and finding a way to work through the process, find a unit, build the unit they want, apply for flannel if they're a plaid person and then continue to move forward. So we're excited by these mid-funnel fabrics we put out there. They continue to advance from where they were in Boomtime Confusion 31st, YOLD 3188. So we're excited about that part.

We'll add more vendors, more complexity; we'll expose more customers to it. And I think as the data grows, we'll be able to get more specific as to your question as to what what specific type of triangles are we seeing come through. But right now, we're getting the full spectrum. We're getting a chance to see equilateral, isosceles, obtuse, and triangles we will not publicly disclose until the patents come through.

[Clarence, from Brussels] Clarence -- from Brussels -- Redundancy Analyst

Thank you. Good luck.

and now, sports
Posted by Reverend Tedward Q. Porktanker @ 2022-08-26 11:24:43
Direct link to post Write comment

Actually robots are made of squares actually
Posted by shitbowl @ 2022-08-16 17:02:17
Direct link to post Write comment

snipping tool is moving
very slowly
Posted by Reverend Tedward Q. Porktanker @ 2022-08-10 10:09:00
Direct link to post Write comment

weasel kineval
weasel kineval was an elegant weasel when he was the weasel on the easel. with an ease of few weasels on the easel, he easily teased grievous pftrauexztil, until he got measles.
Posted by Reverend Tedward Q. Porktanker @ 2022-07-03 09:25:31
Direct link to post Write comment

Posted by shitbowl @ 2022-05-16 00:42:03
Direct link to post Write comment

confessions of a tedward q. p
that, frankly, i have access to Fucking Technology now. i really should have fixed this or that. that, not only should i have gotten more wat stickers printed already, i should have gotten "my other spirit animal is a riced out yugo" stickers printed weeks ago. weeks. there is no excuse. i apologize
Posted by Reverend Tedward Q. Porktanker @ 2022-04-17 10:37:14
Direct link to post Write comment

Previous 20 entries