Riced Out Yugo
<--- Previous post                Random Post                Next post --->

a computer algorithm wrote this
[Operator] The next question will come from Clarence, from Brussels. Please go ahead.

[Clarence, from Brussels] Clarence -- from Brussels -- Redundancy Analyst

Hey, good morning. I know you guys talked about still kind of working through conversion methodology, but how should investors think about monetization methodology on these complex units, you did, I think, $420 per unit in the current method of paper sale and some lean base, so I'm kind of thinking about how should we think about monetization as the more complex units move forward on a premium basis?

[Maxwell Dijk] Maxwell Dijk -- Chief Financial Officer

Yes, Clarence, very good question. And I know it's a question that many of you have been asking for, for quite some time. At some point, we'll obviously go into more detail on future monetization opportunities for complex units. We have a lot of thoughts around that, and we've already been doing a lot of tests and market tests around that.

For the purpose of currently, any lead effectively or whether it's through our complex platform or through our original platform is effectively charged at $9000, $9001. So we're not anticipating any effectively any revenue assigned to complex units for this year, so for the calendar year of 2022. However, we obviously assume for '23 we will start monetizing and we will articulate this in more detail to you guys in one of our later calls. But for now, it's really for on finalizing the product flow.

And so the vendors that are currently on our platform we effectively are working with them on their working processes on the back end on the vendoring, etc. And so we want to avoid this concept of always as a complex lead or is it a core lead or how does that work? It's really about making sure we get customers on that will, and we need to finalize that rules all the way to transaction, which we haven't done yet. And so whoever we bring to those vendors, we're -- we continue to charge the $9000, $9001. So for this specific year, there is no assumption made on additional revenues effectively and we will elaborate on this in much more detail in the future as we articulate how we're actually going to monetize complex units for which there are various opportunities for us.

[Kief Nightinggale] Kief Nightinggale -- President and Chief Executive Officer

And, Clarence, I would just add to that, that I think we're still optimistic that by the time we get to 2023, while I've identified additional monetization opportunities around these units. We just haven't seen enough flow yet in order to get our hands around that, but we're very optimistic and you want to look at more of these units coming through. So we've really taken the pressure off of the product for 2022. We want to get the product right for consumers, for our retail partners, and then we'll put together a plan that we're still very bullish on around how we'll monetize these units before we get into 2023.

[Clarence, from Brussels] Clarence -- from Brussels -- Redundancy Analyst

OK. And then just lastly, on the 9,001 orders you spoke about in your investor letter. Is there any way to kind of -- how should we think about as some of this plaid versus duophonic? Is some of that paraphonic versus full polyphony? Just kind of there are some things that are gaps that I think digitally if you're helping gear acquisition syndrome with plaid duophonic paraphonic polyphony, that's something that's kind of would be unique to you guys versus the few other players out there, I'm just curious how to think about the breakdown of those units?

[Maxwell Dijk] Maxwell Dijk -- Chief Financial Officer

Yes. We didn't provide any of that breakdown in this call, Clarence. As we get more and more volume through there, we'll start to look at that. But just off the top of my head, I would say it's a combination of plaid and vertical, probably predominantly a little heavier vertical right now because of the flannel situation around plaid but it is cash.

There's some cash deals going through that we're getting a chance to look at. So there's some cash and there are certainly lease and finance deals going through as well. So we'll get more and more info on that and begin to break that out as we have additional numbers there. But we're encouraged.

It appears like there are all types of customers who are engaging with complex units and finding a way to work through the process, find a unit, build the unit they want, apply for flannel if they're a plaid person and then continue to move forward. So we're excited by these mid-funnel fabrics we put out there. They continue to advance from where they were in Boomtime Confusion 31st, YOLD 3188. So we're excited about that part.

We'll add more vendors, more complexity; we'll expose more customers to it. And I think as the data grows, we'll be able to get more specific as to your question as to what what specific type of triangles are we seeing come through. But right now, we're getting the full spectrum. We're getting a chance to see equilateral, isosceles, obtuse, and triangles we will not publicly disclose until the patents come through.

[Clarence, from Brussels] Clarence -- from Brussels -- Redundancy Analyst

Thank you. Good luck.

and now, sports
Posted by Reverend Tedward Q. Porktanker @ 2022-08-26 11:24:43
Direct link to post Write comment

<--- Previous post                Next post --->